How do Docker and other container services differ from KVMs?
Looking at this question and its answers, it’s clear that a few points make container services fairly different from traditional VMs:
They can save on performance and space by sharing the host’s operating system
- Programmatically removes files/folder resides in docker container
- Load kernel module from mac os sierra host to a docker container
- Installing netstat on docker linux container
- docker-compose oci runtime error starting container process caused connection reset by peer
- Docker Container compared with Unikernel
- Setting up our own private docker hub
They further save space using the AuFS filesystem, which allows them to share the hard drive with the host
All of this allows them to boot in a fraction of the time it takes for a full VM.
I may have some misconceptions about how KVMs work and about the hypervisor model, but aren’t containers much like KVMs? In what do they differ, and what are the performance gains/losses for either of them?
One Solution collect form web for “How do Docker and other container services differ from KVMs?”
I may have some misconceptions about how KVMs work and about the
hypervisor model, but aren’t containers much like KVMs? In what do
they differ, and what are the performance gains/losses for either of
A virtual machine is just that — “virtual” hardware that can boot pretty much any compatible operating system. For example, you can run Windows in a VM on your Linux host. A VM provides a variety of emulated hardware, including the CPU, network cards, storage interfaces, and so forth.
In contrast, a container is nothing more than a collection of processes on your host. Processes running inside the container are no different from processes running outside the container — from the host you can see them with
ps, manage them using tools like
kill, etc. Because of this, processes running in containers are using your host kernel — you can’t, say, run a Windows binary inside a container on your Linux host.
Because they’re not performing any sort of hardware virtualization, containers are substantially lighter weight than virtual machines. As long as you are able to work with their limitations (ie., the fact that they are limited to the host operating system kernel), they will yield better utilization of hardware than running the same services inside a virtual machine.